• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Perhaps a more complete analysis could explain the memory-belief also on lines of association and habit, but the causes of beliefs are obscure, and we cannot investigate them yet. As regards the memory-belief, we must, at least provisionally, accept Bergson's view that it cannot be brought under the head of habit, at any rate when it first occurs, i.e. when we remember something we never remembered before. Hence Bergson's interpenetration of the present by the past, Hegelian continuity and identity-in-diversity, and a host of other notions which are thought to be profound because they are obscure and confused. A memory is "precise" when the occurrences that would verify it are narrowly circumscribed: instruments for analysis instance, "I met Jones" is precise as compared to "I met a man." A memory is "accurate" when it is both precise and true, i.e. in the above instance, if it was Jones I met. And when I merely remember that I met a man, my memory may be very inadequate to my practical requirements, since it may make a great difference whether I met Brown or Jones. It is precise even if it is false, provided some very definite occurrence would have been required to make it true.

It follows from what has been said that a vague thought has more likelihood of being true than a precise one. It should be observed that vague beliefs, so far from being necessarily false, have a better chance of truth than precise ones, though their truth is less valuable than that of precise beliefs, since they do not distinguish between occurrences which may differ in important ways. We might be tempted to put the memory-belief into the words: "Something like this image occurred." But such words would be very far from an accurate translation of the simplest kind of memory-belief. Accuracy of response in regard to any particular kind of stimulus is improved by practice. Strictly speaking, the limit of this, i.e. the derivative of the response with respect to the stimulus. A mental response is called "vague" in proportion to its lack of accuracy, or rather precision. In the case of thought, the response does not follow immediately upon the sensational stimulus, but that makes no difference as regards our present question. The whole of the above discussion of vagueness and accuracy was occasioned by the attempt to interpret the word "this" when we judge in verbal memory that "this occurred." The word "this," in such a judgment, is a vague word, equally applicable to the present memory-image and to the past occurrence which is its prototype.

But when we become precise, our remembering becomes different from that of ordinary life, and if we forget this we shall go wrong in the analysis of ordinary memory. Choosing a commercial oil analysis lab is a big deal and you must not take it for granted. instruments for analysis the present we must content ourselves with the fact that the memory-image can be explained by habit. In order to deal with this topic we must consider the verbal expression of the memory-belief. In cases of this sort, habit (or association) explains why the present feature of the environment brings up the memory-image, but it does not explain the memory-belief. The memory-belief confers upon the memory-image something which we may call "meaning;" it makes us feel that the image points to an object which existed in the past. To try and hit an object with a precise thought is like trying to hit the bull's eye with a bullet.

For example, if the whole target is represented by the fungus family and the bull's eye by mushrooms, a vague thought which can only hit the target as a whole is not much use from a culinary point of view. Cajita MI, Hodgson NA, Budhathoki C, Han H. Intention to Use mHealth in Older Adults With Heart Failure. After much deliberation, Wright decided to use regional rainfall as his instrumental variable: he concluded that rainfall affected grass production and hence milk production and ultimately butter supply, but not butter demand. 19. Zhao, K.G.; Popescu, S. Lidar-based mapping of leaf area index and its use instruments for analysis validating GLOBCARBON satellite LAI product in a temperate forest of the southern USA. An instrument is a "measure" of a set of stimuli which are serially ordered when its responses, in all cases where they are relevantly different, are arranged in a series in the same order. Of a vague subject, such as a "this," which is both an image and its prototype, contradictory predicates are true simultaneously: this existed and does not exist, since it is a thing remembered, but also this exists and did not exist, since it is a present image. This, however, would be a mistake, produced by attempting to give to words a precision which they do not possess when used by unsophisticated people.